This is an archived version of a Field of Schemes article. Comments on this page are closed. To find the current version of the article with updated comments, click here.
June 01, 2010
Stanley Cup economic impact in Philly: Not so much
Sunday's Philadelphia Inquirer featured a rare article that debunks the usual wild claims of economic windfalls from pro sports playoff games: Despite the Flyers playing in the Stanley Cup Finals, notes the paper, neither the team nor the city will reap all that much money as a result.
In particular, notes economist Andrew Zimbalist, the claims by Flyers president Peter Luukko that the city will gain $200,000 in tax revenue per game are likely inflated, since "pretty much all the people who are going to be at the arena will be from Greater Philadelphia, and they spend money at the arena instead of spending it somewhere else in the Philadelphia economy."
Of course, that's not exactly what Zimbalist said in his economic impact analysis paid for by then-New Jersey Nets owner Bruce Ratner, in which he assumed substantial increased tax benefits to New York from moving the Nets to Brooklyn. But like they say in academia, better late than never.
Interesting, Neil... I was a bit surprised when Zimbalist signed on to work for Ratner. I would never suggest that an economist "must" refuse paying work... but I would have thought someone with AZ's background of debunking the sports facility shell game might be inclined to think twice about such an offer, no matter how enticing.
Posted by John Bladen on June 1, 2010 01:32 PMSo no significant traveling away support for Chicago in Philly ?
Posted by nyrmetros on June 3, 2010 05:32 PM